Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FS12
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41d7f/41d7fcbf43c59375f793394d6bee3fc7ecff0e3f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FS12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Launched August 2017
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-124mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 129g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FS12 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FS12, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and FS12 (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and FS12 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M10 III was introduced 8 years later than the FS12 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FS12 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the E-M10 III grades versus the FS12 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FS12 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Panasonic FS12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Panasonic FS12
E-M10 III | FS12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2017 | ![]() | April 2009 | Fresher by 102 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS12 over the Olympus E-M10 III
FS12 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic FS12
E-M10 III | FS12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FS12 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III features outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Panasonic FS12 has dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FS12 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the E-M10 III against the FS12.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cad58/cad586b49ea8fc71b838d7c9079c63d1806fe627" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FS12 size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FS12 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and FS12 is 80 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88951/88951ef09902fd89c6dd7d91ba41d577b1777f24" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FS12 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FS12 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FS12 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing just by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and FS12.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III using its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will render extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 III will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5628/f562844e46504da39a7bc047bb4bfe86868cdfd9" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FS12 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FS12 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df9e2/df9e20ad9ef60bdb1f1db8834f9b71c4c71f975d" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FS12 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2017-08-31 | 2009-04-17 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 31-124mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 6.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 lbs) | 129g (0.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $650 | $228 |