Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic G2
Portability
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
Portability
72 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
72 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic G2 Key Specs
Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Released August 2017
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10 II
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 IV
Panasonic G2
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 428g - 124 x 84 x 74mm
- Announced July 2010
- Old Model is Panasonic G1
- Renewed by Panasonic G3
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic G2 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M10 III versus Panasonic G2, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and G2 (12MP) but they use the same exact sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe E-M10 III was released 7 years after the G2 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-M10 III matches up versus the G2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic G2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Panasonic G2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Panasonic G2
| E-M10 III | G2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2017 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 87 months |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic G2 over the Olympus E-M10 III
| G2 | E-M10 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic G2
| E-M10 III | G2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic G2 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with physical measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Panasonic G2 has sizing of 124mm x 84mm x 74mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 III versus Panasonic G2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 III against the G2.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and G2 is 80 and 72 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic G2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes purely by viewing specifications. The image underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and G2.
Plainly, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus E-M10 III to result in extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The younger E-M10 III will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic G2 Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography information
Panasonic G2 Portrait photography information
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has face detect focus
exports RAW formats
you can focus manually
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
resolution not great (12MP)
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segmentsStreet Comparison
Street photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Street photography with Panasonic G2
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
provides touch focus
great high ISO (25,600)
more heavy than competition (410g)
screen can move to multiple angles
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
features focus by touch
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than competition in class (428g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Sports photography with Panasonic G2
silent shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
has no phase detect auto focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
max frames per second low (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
lacks phase detect AF
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Travel photography with Panasonic G2
provides touch focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
more heavy than competition (410 grams)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
features focus by touch
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (428 grams)
resolution not great (12MP)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography info
Panasonic G2 Landscape photography info
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
great high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging factors
Panasonic G2 Vlogging factors
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect focus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
lack of microphone support
more heavy than competition (410 grams)
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen functionality
has face detect focusing
comes with microphone socket
lack of image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
more heavy than competition in class (428g)
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic G2 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2017-08-31 | 2010-07-12 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 107 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 1,440k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.6fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 11.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 410g (0.90 pounds) | 428g (0.94 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 124 x 84 x 74mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 53 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 493 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 shots | 360 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $650 | $1,000 |
