Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS30
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
92 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 198g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ40
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS25
- Newer Model is Panasonic ZS35
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS30 Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS30, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the ZS30 (18MP) is relatively well matched but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and ZS30 (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M10 III was manufactured 4 years later than the ZS30 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS30 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-M10 III grades vs the ZS30 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS30 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Panasonic ZS30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Panasonic ZS30
E-M10 III | ZS30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2017 | January 2013 | More recent by 57 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Clearer screen (+120k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS30 over the Olympus E-M10 III
ZS30 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic ZS30
E-M10 III | ZS30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS30 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III offers outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS30 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS30 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 III against the ZS30.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and ZS30 is 80 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS30 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and ZS30.
As you can see, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic ZS30 will give greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 III provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS30 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 |
Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-TZ40 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2017-08-31 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 15 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1200 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 6.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 lbs) | 198g (0.44 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 260 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $650 | $250 |