Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax MX-1
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Launched August 2017
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10 II
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Introduced July 2013
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
In this article, we are looking at the Olympus E-M10 III versus Pentax MX-1, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Pentax. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and MX-1 (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and MX-1 (1/1.7") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M10 III was manufactured 4 years later than the MX-1 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax MX-1 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the MX-1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Pentax MX-1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Pentax MX-1
E-M10 III | MX-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2017 | July 2013 | More recent by 51 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 920k | Clearer display (+120k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Olympus E-M10 III
MX-1 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Pentax MX-1
E-M10 III | MX-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III features outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Pentax MX-1 has sizing of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 III versus Pentax MX-1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 III vs the MX-1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and MX-1 is 80 and 84 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements just by checking out a spec sheet. The visual below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and MX-1.
Clearly, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III featuring a larger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M10 III will show extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger E-M10 III is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Pentax MX-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Pentax MX-1 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2017-08-31 | 2013-07-01 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 grams (0.90 pounds) | 391 grams (0.86 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 208 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 290 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | D-Li-106 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $650 | $400 |