Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX1
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc791/dc791c379c416f050f2a7563d8e9c10fefab17d4" alt="Ricoh CX1 front Ricoh CX1 front"
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Launched August 2017
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX1, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and CX1 (9MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and CX1 (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-M10 III was introduced 8 years after the CX1 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-M10 III grades vs the CX1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Ricoh CX1. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Ricoh CX1
E-M10 III | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2017 | ![]() | February 2009 | Newer by 104 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer screen (+120k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus E-M10 III
CX1 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Ricoh CX1
E-M10 III | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 III has got outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Ricoh CX1 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 III vs the CX1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11c67/11c678b0e44883ad4b93b81d9d8dc2346db4fb59" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and CX1 is 80 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d61a6/d61a6d9bdc109c7d1e3bf2aab35ad10747d3ce7f" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and CX1.
As you can see, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 III will render extra detail using its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The younger E-M10 III should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4757/d475756547ad71747d8778dd89ba5541f00db5a5" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15c67/15c677b4767e0db070f15f7acb48b218fdc9a307" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Ricoh CX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Ricoh CX1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2017-08-31 | 2009-02-19 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 9MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.2 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 pounds) | 180 gr (0.40 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $650 | $299 |