Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63


84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Announced August 2017
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Announced August 2011

Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) provide different sensor dimensions.

The E-M10 III was unveiled 6 years later than the GXR Mount A12 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-M10 III grades vs the GXR Mount A12 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Ricoh GXR Mount A12. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
E-M10 III | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2017 | ![]() | August 2011 | More recent by 74 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper screen (+120k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Olympus E-M10 III
GXR Mount A12 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
E-M10 III | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III offers physical measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has dimensions of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") and a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the E-M10 III vs the GXR Mount A12.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and GXR Mount A12 is 80 and 84 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements just by checking technical specs. The photograph below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and GXR Mount A12.
As you have seen, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will resolve greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-M10 III provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2017-08-31 | 2011-08-05 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | () |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/9000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 9.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lb) | 370 gr (0.82 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 330 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (5 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $650 | $349 |