Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS3
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a426/9a4260754748d1d18e1d86724961ebe1d9136dca" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL8 front Olympus PEN E-PL8 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91d60/91d606f8f15554d192c44ec0e68c877e6a1eff9a" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 front"
91 Imaging
33 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL7
- Successor is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Announced May 2009
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ7
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS3 Overview
Here is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS3, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the E-PL8 (16MP) and ZS3 (10MP) and the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and ZS3 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-PL8 was introduced 7 years later than the ZS3 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS3 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-PL8 scores against the ZS3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL8 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery and Panasonic ZS3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Panasonic ZS3
E-PL8 | ZS3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | May 2009 | Fresher by 90 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS3 over the Olympus E-PL8
ZS3 | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Panasonic ZS3
E-PL8 | ZS3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL8 features physical dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS3 has specifications of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-PL8 versus the ZS3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28cc9/28cc9a8ba981d7ed7d8afc5bdb53bc686af7270c" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS3 size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS3 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL8 and ZS3 is 86 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4603f/4603fa7d5298afb4b94c4bf5b1caedb29449897a" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizing simply by checking out technical specs. The photograph here should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL8 and ZS3.
As you can tell, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL8 with its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-PL8 will show extra detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The more recent E-PL8 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecd3e/ecd3e1e5f7e2f0be0e75508f9b747b77da8a67e1" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/491ae/491ae5fe049b3c0c731f5d7152a120ed70ab4519" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS3 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ7 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 357g (0.79 lbs) | 229g (0.50 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $500 | $200 |