Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung EX2F

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Samsung EX2F front
Portability
90
Imaging
37
Features
62
Overall
47

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Released August 2017
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M10 II
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Samsung EX2F
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
  • 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
  • Launched December 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung EX2F Overview

Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-M10 III versus Samsung EX2F, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and EX2F (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M10 III was manufactured 4 years later than the EX2F and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung EX2F being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-M10 III scores versus the EX2F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Samsung EX2F

 E-M10 III EX2F 
LaunchedAugust 2017December 2012More recent by 58 months
Screen resolution1040k0kClearer screen (+1040k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Olympus E-M10 III

 EX2F E-M10 III 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung EX2F

 E-M10 III EX2F 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen dimensions

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III offers physical measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Samsung EX2F has measurements of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M10 III versus Samsung EX2F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the EX2F.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung EX2F size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and EX2F is 80 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung EX2F top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements merely by viewing technical specs. The visual underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and EX2F.

As you can tell, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III because of its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M10 III will result in more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 III is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung EX2F sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung EX2F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung EX2F as a Portrait photography camera
73
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
42
manual focus
delivers RAW files
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Street photography details
Samsung EX2F Street photography details
77
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
includes touch focus
above average ISO range (25,600)
heavier than competition (410 grams)
68
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
sensor is small (1/1.7")
more heavy than competitors (294g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography features
Samsung EX2F Sports photography features
69
silent shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
lack of phase detect autofocus
31
built in image stabilization (Optical)
low MP (12MP)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
has no phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography advice
Samsung EX2F Travel photography advice
67
includes touch focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
heavier than competition (410 grams)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
66
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
fairly wide (24mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.4)
lack of Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors (294g)
low MP (12MP)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography factors
Samsung EX2F Landscape photography factors
80
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
53
manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.4)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
lack of Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Vlogging camera
Samsung EX2F as a Vlogging camera
32
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection autofocus
great video quality (3840 x 2160 pixels)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
does not have external mic socket
heavier than competition (410 grams)
71
fairly wide (24mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.4)
selfie friendly screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lack of external microphone support
more heavy than competitors (294g)
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung EX2F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung EX2F
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIISamsung EX2F
General Information
Make Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Samsung EX2F
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2017-08-31 2012-12-18
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW data
Lowest enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 121 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-80mm (3.3x)
Largest aperture - f/1.4-2.7
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 4.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Fully Articulated
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 1,040 thousand dots 0 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech - AMOLED
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs -
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs -
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shutter rate 8.6 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.80 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash options Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 410 gr (0.90 lb) 294 gr (0.65 lb)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 48
DXO Color Depth score not tested 20.0
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.5
DXO Low light score not tested 209
Other
Battery life 330 shots -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-50 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Retail cost $650 $478