Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung EX2F
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Released August 2017
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Launched December 2012
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-M10 III versus Samsung EX2F, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and EX2F (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M10 III was manufactured 4 years later than the EX2F and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung EX2F being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-M10 III scores versus the EX2F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Samsung EX2F. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Samsung EX2F
E-M10 III | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2017 | December 2012 | More recent by 58 months | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 0k | Clearer screen (+1040k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Olympus E-M10 III
EX2F | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung EX2F
E-M10 III | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III offers physical measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Samsung EX2F has measurements of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M10 III versus Samsung EX2F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the EX2F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and EX2F is 80 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements merely by viewing technical specs. The visual underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and EX2F.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III because of its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M10 III will result in more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 III is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Samsung EX2F |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2017-08-31 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/1.4-2.7 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | - |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.6 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lb) | 294 gr (0.65 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $650 | $478 |