Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ10W

Portability
80
Imaging
54
Features
75
Overall
62
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Samsung HZ10W front
Portability
90
Imaging
32
Features
27
Overall
30

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Launched August 2017
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Samsung HZ10W
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
  • 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
  • Announced May 2009
  • Additionally Known as WB500
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ10W Overview

In this article, we are matching up the Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ10W, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and HZ10W (10MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and HZ10W (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-M10 III was launched 8 years later than the HZ10W and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ10W being a Compact camera.

Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the HZ10W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Samsung HZ10W

 E-M10 III HZ10W 
AnnouncedAugust 2017May 2009More recent by 102 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1040k230kSharper display (+810k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Olympus E-M10 III

 HZ10W E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung HZ10W

 E-M10 III HZ10W 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison

If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III provides outside measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ10W has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ10W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 III and the HZ10W.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ10W size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and HZ10W is 80 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ10W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements only by seeing a spec sheet. The visual below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and HZ10W.

Clearly, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M10 III will produce extra detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ10W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Portrait photography with Samsung HZ10W
72
focusing manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
30
manual focus
provides face detection focus
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Street photography features
Samsung HZ10W Street photography features
76
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
offers focus by touch
great ISO range (25,600)
more heavy than average (410 grams)
52
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
heavier than competition (249g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography information
Samsung HZ10W Sports photography information
68
quiet shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
lacks phase detect autofocus
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography features
Samsung HZ10W Travel photography features
66
offers focus by touch
MP count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
more heavy than average (410g)
display isn't selfie friendly
53
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (249 grams)
low megapixels (10MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography highlights
Samsung HZ10W Landscape photography highlights
79
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
35
manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 III
Vlogging with Samsung HZ10W
32
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone support
more heavy than average (410 grams)
28
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focus
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic socket
heavier than competition (249g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung HZ10W
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIISamsung HZ10W
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Samsung HZ10W
Also referred to as - WB500
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2017-08-31 2009-05-14
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2432
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW images
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-240mm (10.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.3-5.8
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 1,040k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 16s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1500s
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shooting rate 8.6 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash modes Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 410 grams (0.90 lbs) 249 grams (0.55 lbs)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 pictures -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $650 $300