Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-330
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus VR-320
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-330, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Olympus. The resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is very similar and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-2 iHS was introduced 2 years later than the VR-330 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short overview of how the TG-2 iHS scores versus the VR-330 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Olympus VR-330. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus VR-330
| TG-2 iHS | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2013 |  | February 2011 | Fresher by 30 months |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| VR-330 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Olympus VR-330
| TG-2 iHS | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has got physical dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the TG-2 iHS versus the VR-330.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and VR-330 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading technical specs. The visual below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-2 iHS and VR-330.
As you can tell, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should expect to see the Olympus VR-330 to offer you greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The younger TG-2 iHS should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Olympus VR-330 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-06-28 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 610 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | OLED | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lb) | 158 gr (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $380 | $220 |