Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX300
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63


86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Announced August 2017
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Older Model is Samsung NX210
- Later Model is Samsung NX500

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX300 Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Olympus E-M10 III versus Samsung NX300, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the NX300 (20MP) is fairly close but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and NX300 (APS-C) posses different sensor measurements.

The E-M10 III was unveiled 3 years later than the NX300 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-M10 III matches up against the NX300 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Samsung NX300. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Samsung NX300
E-M10 III | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2017 | ![]() | November 2013 | Fresher by 46 months |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 768k | Sharper display (+272k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Olympus E-M10 III
NX300 | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.3" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung NX300
E-M10 III | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III has outside dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Samsung NX300 has dimensions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") having a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 III versus Samsung NX300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 III and the NX300.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and NX300 is 80 and 86 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by researching a spec sheet. The visual here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and NX300.
Clearly, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Samsung NX300 will result in greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 III provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Samsung NX300 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2017-08-31 | 2013-11-24 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Number of lenses | 107 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 768k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 grams (0.90 lb) | 331 grams (0.73 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 76 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 330 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $650 | $750 |