Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX300M
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX300M Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Announced January 2013
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX300M Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Olympus E-M10 III versus Samsung NX300M, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by brands Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the NX300M (20MP) is fairly well matched but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and NX300M (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M10 III was unveiled 4 years after the NX300M which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX300M being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-M10 III grades vs the NX300M in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX300M Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Samsung NX300M. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Samsung NX300M Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Samsung NX300M
E-M10 III | NX300M | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2017 | January 2013 | More modern by 57 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 768k | Crisper display (+272k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Olympus E-M10 III
NX300M | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung NX300M
E-M10 III | NX300M | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX300M Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III has outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Samsung NX300M has proportions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 III versus Samsung NX300M in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 III and the NX300M.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and NX300M is 80 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX300M Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes merely by looking at specs. The image below should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and NX300M.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 III using its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Samsung NX300M will give extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 III provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX300M Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung NX300M Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Samsung NX300M | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Samsung NX300M |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2017-08-31 | 2013-01-03 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Total lenses | 107 | 32 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 768 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/6000s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.6 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lb) | 331 gr (0.73 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 330 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $650 | $699 |