Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung TL350
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Launched August 2017
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Alternate Name is WB2000
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung TL350, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and TL350 (10MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and TL350 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M10 III was revealed 7 years after the TL350 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL350 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-M10 III scores versus the TL350 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Samsung TL350. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Samsung TL350
E-M10 III | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2017 | February 2010 | More modern by 92 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 920k | Sharper display (+120k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Olympus E-M10 III
TL350 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung TL350
E-M10 III | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III features outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Samsung TL350 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung TL350 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 III versus the TL350.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and TL350 is 80 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor sizes simply by looking at specifications. The pic here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and TL350.
To sum up, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 III using its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 III will give you greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The younger E-M10 III will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Samsung TL350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Samsung TL350 |
Also called | - | WB2000 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2017-08-31 | 2010-02-20 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.4-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 5.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 lbs) | 195g (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $650 | $400 |