Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill

Portability
80
Imaging
54
Features
75
Overall
62
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Sigma DP2 Merrill front
Portability
83
Imaging
55
Features
33
Overall
46

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Launched August 2017
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 IV
Sigma DP2 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 50mm (F2.8) lens
  • 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
  • Revealed February 2012
  • Older Model is Sigma DP1 Merrill
  • Replacement is Sigma DP3 Merrill
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview

On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sigma DP2 Merrill, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sigma. The resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is very similar but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) boast totally different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-M10 III was launched 5 years later than the DP2 Merrill and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-M10 III scores against the DP2 Merrill with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sigma DP2 Merrill

 E-M10 III DP2 Merrill 
RevealedAugust 2017February 2012Fresher by 68 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k920kClearer display (+120k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Olympus E-M10 III

 DP2 Merrill E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sigma DP2 Merrill

 E-M10 III DP2 Merrill 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display size
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III has got outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") along with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sigma DP2 Merrill in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 III versus the DP2 Merrill.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and DP2 Merrill is 80 and 83 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing simply by going over a spec sheet. The photograph below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and DP2 Merrill.

Clearly, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Olympus E-M10 III will offer more detail utilizing its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography factors
Sigma DP2 Merrill Portrait photography factors
72
focusing manually
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detect focus
supports RAW formats
73
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (15 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Street photography info
Sigma DP2 Merrill Street photography info
76
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
offers touch to focus
above average ISO range (25,600)
heavier than average in class (410 grams)
65
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography details
Sigma DP2 Merrill Sports photography details
68
silent shooting (1/16,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
no phase detect auto focus
44
megapixel count decent (15MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (50mm)
slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
does not have phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography factors
Sigma DP2 Merrill Travel photography factors
66
offers touch to focus
MP count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
heavier than average in class (410 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
54
megapixel count decent (15 megapixels)
missing Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma DP2 Merrill as a Landscape photography camera
79
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
55
has manual focus
screen size is decent (3 inches)
megapixel count decent (15 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (50mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
missing Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Vlogging camera
Sigma DP2 Merrill as a Vlogging camera
32
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect focus
high res video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing mic socket
heavier than average in class (410 grams)
22
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Sigma DP2 Merrill
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIISigma DP2 Merrill
General Information
Make Olympus Sigma
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Sigma DP2 Merrill
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2017-08-31 2012-02-08
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII Dual TRUE II engine
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 15MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4704 x 3136
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW images
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 50mm (1x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds -
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds -
Highest silent shutter speed 1/16000 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 8.6 frames per second 4.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.80 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 640x480
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 410g (0.90 lbs) 330g (0.73 lbs)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 images -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) -
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $650 $931