Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A230
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88116/88116e64f46e39b4199ab42d569c8a4fa375dbc2" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 front"
69 Imaging
50 Features
40 Overall
46
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A230 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A230 Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony A230, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and A230 (10MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and A230 (APS-C) posses different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-M10 III was launched 8 years later than the A230 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A230 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-M10 III matches up versus the A230 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A230 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Sony Alpha DSLR-A230. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Sony A230 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony A230
E-M10 III | A230 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2017 | ![]() | May 2009 | More recent by 101 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A230 over the Olympus E-M10 III
A230 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony A230
E-M10 III | A230 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A230 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III provides physical dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Sony A230 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony A230 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 III versus the A230.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f08b/3f08b74920632b8f5733f61fde2edd7ec0dd00c3" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A230 size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A230 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and A230 is 80 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ece9d/ece9dafd0af17464ed79c89d2e74bda93b3dc0f5" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A230 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A230 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A230 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements only by seeing specs. The graphic underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and A230.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Olympus E-M10 III will produce more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger E-M10 III provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2ff9/b2ff9773aea4351cf4304db17e66aba09389b74d" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A230 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A230 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A230 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3b57/e3b57f1e33991420d315af5b66ecfec8a508f658" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A230 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2017-08-31 | 2009-05-18 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Total lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 pounds) | 490 gr (1.08 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 128 x 97 x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 531 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 230 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $650 | $569 |