Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony W370

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 front
Portability
94
Imaging
36
Features
25
Overall
31

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony W370 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Released August 2017
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Sony W370
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 34-238mm (F3.6-5.6) lens
  • 179g - 100 x 57 x 26mm
  • Announced January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony W370 Overview

Here is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony W370, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the W370 (14MP) is relatively well matched but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and W370 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M10 III was launched 7 years later than the W370 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W370 being a Compact camera.

Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-M10 III grades against the W370 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

				

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony W370

 E-M10 III W370 
AnnouncedAugust 2017January 2010Fresher by 94 months
Manual focus More exact focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k230kClearer screen (+810k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony W370 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 W370 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony W370

 E-M10 III W370 
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurement
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony W370 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III provides exterior measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Sony W370 has measurements of 100mm x 57mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony W370 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the W370.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony W370 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and W370 is 80 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony W370 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony W370 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing purely by looking at technical specs. The photograph underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and W370.

As you have seen, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 III will give greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 III provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony W370 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony W370 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony W370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography information
Sony W370 Portrait photography information
73
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detection focus
exports RAW files
28
decent megapixels (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Street photography details
Sony W370 Street photography details
77
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
provides touch focus
great high ISO (25,600)
more heavy than average in class (410g)
56
image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography highlights
Sony W370 Sports photography highlights
69
quiet shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
lack of phase detect auto focus
34
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography information
Sony W370 Travel photography information
67
provides touch focus
good megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
more heavy than average in class (410 grams)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
58
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.6)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Landscape photography with Sony W370
80
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
great high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
37
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.6)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging features
Sony W370 Vlogging features
32
touch screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection focus
high res video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
doesn't have external microphone support
more heavy than average in class (410 grams)
25
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.6)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony W370 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Sony W370
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-W370
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2017-08-31 2010-01-07
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW pictures
Min enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 34-238mm (7.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.6-5.6
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,040k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 2s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1600s
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shutter speed 8.6 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 410 gr (0.90 pounds) 179 gr (0.39 pounds)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 100 x 57 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 photographs -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-50 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/ Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $650 $230