Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-1 II
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32c25/32c25c6ef6b46a16d6fe37b7519c064ff3aff376" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 front Olympus OM-D E-M10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/376a8/376a854d97b2e287bdc42f8b91c8e24498c40056" alt="Pentax K-1 Mark II front Pentax K-1 Mark II front"
55 Imaging
77 Features
82 Overall
79
Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Introduced March 2014
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 36MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 819200
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF4 Mount
- 1010g - 137 x 110 x 86mm
- Announced February 2018
- Replaced the Pentax K-1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-1 II Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-M10 and Pentax K-1 II, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Pentax. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the E-M10 (16MP) and K-1 II (36MP) and the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and K-1 II (Full frame) boast different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M10 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the K-1 II which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-1 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-M10 scores against the K-1 II for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-1 II Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 and Pentax K-1 Mark II. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 Gallery and Pentax K-1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Pentax K-1 II
E-M10 | K-1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-1 II over the Olympus E-M10
K-1 II | E-M10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | ![]() | March 2014 | More modern by 47 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimensions | 3.2" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Pentax K-1 II
E-M10 | K-1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 1037k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-1 II Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 features external measurements of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) while the Pentax K-1 II has proportions of 137mm x 110mm x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") along with a weight of 1010 grams (2.23 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 and Pentax K-1 II in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M10 versus the K-1 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ecf0/8ecf0d1deac1785702efcc0e207a353c325b5f9b" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-1 II size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-1 II size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 and K-1 II is 82 and 55 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1a1a/c1a1a0b8c3eb59c88b0a1a2ab687460c08514d08" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-1 II top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-1 II top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-1 II Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading technical specs. The pic here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 and K-1 II.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Pentax K-1 II will offer you greater detail having an extra 20 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-M10 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b57a6/b57a60fb4f3d1548966a6b67cbaa97953e75b4c8" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-1 II sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-1 II sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-1 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b7ab/2b7ab7abcb7fd423bb72e258b23555ba40254f7b" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-1 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Pentax K-1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Pentax K-1 Mark II |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2014-03-18 | 2018-02-22 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | PRIME IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 36MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 7360 x 4912 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 819200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 33 |
Cross type focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF4 |
Available lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3" | 3.2" |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 4.4fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/200 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 396 gr (0.87 lb) | 1010 gr (2.23 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 137 x 110 x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 884 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | 670 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) |
Storage slots | 1 | Dual |
Price at release | $600 | $1,737 |