Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-S2
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32c25/32c25c6ef6b46a16d6fe37b7519c064ff3aff376" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 front Olympus OM-D E-M10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17f5c/17f5cd4f03c94030eab99c5ab77b6a4371e5b9be" alt="Pentax K-S2 front Pentax K-S2 front"
64 Imaging
63 Features
82 Overall
70
Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-S2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 678g - 123 x 91 x 73mm
- Launched February 2015
- Replaced the Pentax K-S1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-S2 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-S2, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-M10 (16MP) and the K-S2 (20MP) is pretty close but the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and K-S2 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-M10 was introduced 10 months earlier than the K-S2 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-S2 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-M10 scores against the K-S2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-S2 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 and Pentax K-S2. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 Gallery and Pentax K-S2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Pentax K-S2
E-M10 | K-S2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 921k | Clearer screen (+116k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-S2 over the Olympus E-M10
K-S2 | E-M10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | March 2014 | Fresher by 10 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Pentax K-S2
E-M10 | K-S2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-S2 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 enjoys external measurements of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") along with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-S2 has sizing of 123mm x 91mm x 73mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.9") along with a weight of 678 grams (1.49 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-S2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 and the K-S2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/362ff/362ff10c3752b114e4911bfb8081e68a7a59c92d" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-S2 size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-S2 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 and K-S2 is 82 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff478/ff478a923754add21fdff92f44630ec1be6b65a7" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-S2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-S2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-S2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizing simply by researching a spec sheet. The photograph here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 and K-S2.
Clearly, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 having a smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Pentax K-S2 will provide you with more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older E-M10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f55bb/f55bba6d59f7754e74fd7591c175234ec28677e0" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-S2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-S2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-S2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f665d/f665d684003afbf6fb7efa0eab1ea7985ab1481c" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-S2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-S2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-S2 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Pentax K-S2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Pentax K-S2 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2014-03-18 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | PRIME MII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 5.4 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 396 grams (0.87 lbs) | 678 grams (1.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 123 x 91 x 73mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 884 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 410 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | D-LI109 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes (2 or 12 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $600 | $581 |