Clicky

Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
82
Imaging
52
Features
73
Overall
60
Olympus OM-D E-M10 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
62
Features
38
Overall
52

Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Olympus E-M10
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
  • Announced March 2014
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M10 II
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Released February 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sigma. The resolution of the E-M10 (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is relatively close but the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) have different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-M10 was released 2 months later than the DP2 Quattro and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-M10 grades vs the DP2 Quattro for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 E-M10 DP2 Quattro 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1037k920kCrisper screen (+117k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus E-M10

 DP2 Quattro E-M10 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 E-M10 DP2 Quattro 
ReleasedMarch 2014February 2014Same generation
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 has got exterior dimensions of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") along with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has dimensions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 against the DP2 Quattro.

Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 and DP2 Quattro is 82 and 70 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing simply by viewing specifications. The visual here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 and DP2 Quattro.

To sum up, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures way more aggressively.

Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Portrait photography camera
71
manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
features face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
77
manual focus
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
comes with face detect focus
saves RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M10
Street photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
77
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
has focus by touch
very good high ISO (25,600)
more heavy than competition in class (396 grams)
61
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
no image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Sports photography camera
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
features tracking focus
no phase detect autofocus
47
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
lacks phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M10
Travel photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
67
has focus by touch
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
more heavy than competition in class (396g)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
53
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10
Landscape photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
79
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
59
manual focus
screen size is decent (3 inches)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10
Vlogging with Sigma DP2 Quattro
33
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detect autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
no microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (396 grams)
9
no video recording
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Olympus OM-D E-M10Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Brand Olympus Sigma
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2014-03-18 2014-02-13
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VII TRUE III engine
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 5424 x 3616
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 81 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 45mm (1x)
Max aperture - f/2.8
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 1,037k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology TFT LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 1,440k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 8.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.80 m (ISO100) no built-in flash
Flash settings Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) no built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 396 grams (0.87 lb) 395 grams (0.87 lb)
Physical dimensions 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 72 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 22.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 884 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photographs -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-5 BP-51
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $600 $931