Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
82 Imaging
52 Features
73 Overall
60
70 Imaging
62 Features
38 Overall
52
Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Announced March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Released February 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sigma. The resolution of the E-M10 (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is relatively close but the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) have different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M10 was released 2 months later than the DP2 Quattro and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-M10 grades vs the DP2 Quattro for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
| E-M10 | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Crisper screen (+117k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus E-M10
| DP2 Quattro | E-M10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
| E-M10 | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2014 | February 2014 | Same generation | |
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 has got exterior dimensions of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") along with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has dimensions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 against the DP2 Quattro.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 and DP2 Quattro is 82 and 70 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing simply by viewing specifications. The visual here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 and DP2 Quattro.
To sum up, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures way more aggressively.
Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-03-18 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | TRUE III engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 45mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 396 grams (0.87 lb) | 395 grams (0.87 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 884 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-5 | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $600 | $931 |