Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A99 II
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
57 Imaging
77 Features
92 Overall
83
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A99 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Launched March 2014
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Push to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 849g - 143 x 104 x 76mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Superseded the Sony A99
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A99 II Overview
The following is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-M10 and Sony A99 II, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M10 (16MP) and A99 II (42MP) and the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and A99 II (Full frame) provide totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M10 was brought out 3 years prior to the A99 II which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A99 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-M10 grades against the A99 II in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A99 II Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 & Sony Alpha A99 II. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 Gallery & Sony A99 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Sony A99 II
E-M10 | A99 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A99 II over the Olympus E-M10
A99 II | E-M10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | March 2014 | Newer by 30 months | |
Screen type | Fully articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 1037k | Crisper screen (+192k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Sony A99 II
E-M10 | A99 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A99 II Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 provides physical dimensions of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") and a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) and the Sony A99 II has measurements of 143mm x 104mm x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") and a weight of 849 grams (1.87 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 and Sony A99 II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 compared to the A99 II.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 and A99 II is 82 and 57 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A99 II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through specs. The image underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 and A99 II.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Sony A99 II will result in extra detail having its extra 26MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged E-M10 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A99 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A99 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Sony Alpha A99 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Sony Alpha A99 II |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2014-03-18 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 42MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 7952 x 5304 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 399 |
Cross type focus points | - | 79 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Available lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fully articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dots | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, redeye reduction, rear sync, high-speed sync, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 396g (0.87 lb) | 849g (1.87 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 143 x 104 x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | 92 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | 25.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | 13.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 884 | 2317 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | 490 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | NP-FM500H lithium-ion battery & charger |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS Duo slots |
Card slots | One | Dual |
Launch cost | $600 | $3,198 |