Clicky

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX10 IV

Portability
82
Imaging
53
Features
73
Overall
61
Olympus OM-D E-M10 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV front
Portability
52
Imaging
53
Features
82
Overall
64

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs

Olympus E-M10
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
  • Revealed March 2014
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M10 II
Sony RX10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
  • Released September 2017
  • Replaced the Sony RX10 III
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX10 IV Overview

Following is a complete review of the Olympus E-M10 versus Sony RX10 IV, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M10 (16MP) and the RX10 IV (20MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and RX10 IV (1") provide different sensor sizing.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-M10 was brought out 4 years earlier than the RX10 IV which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX10 IV being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-M10 scores vs the RX10 IV with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Sony RX10 IV

 E-M10 RX10 IV 

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 IV over the Olympus E-M10

 RX10 IV E-M10 
ReleasedSeptember 2017March 2014More modern by 42 months
Screen resolution1440k1037kClearer screen (+403k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Sony RX10 IV

 E-M10 RX10 IV 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX10 IV Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 has physical measurements of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) and the Sony RX10 IV has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") accompanied by a weight of 1095 grams (2.41 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M10 versus Sony RX10 IV in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 and the RX10 IV.

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX10 IV size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 and RX10 IV is 82 and 52 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX10 IV top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX10 IV Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by going through specs. The image below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 and RX10 IV.

All in all, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony RX10 IV will show more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged E-M10 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX10 IV sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10
Portrait photography with Sony RX10 IV
71
manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
71
manual focus
great flash sync speed (1/2,000 seconds)
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
has face detect focus
exports RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Street photography info
Sony RX10 IV Street photography info
77
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
has touch to focus
above average ISO range (25,600)
more heavy than others (396 grams)
64
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is decent (1")
exports RAW formats
boasts focus by touch
weather proofing
more heavy than competition (1,095 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10
Sports photography with Sony RX10 IV
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
lack of phase detect autofocus
76
great zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
max frames per second high (24.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
has tracking focus
weather proofing
sensor has phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 as a Travel photography camera
Sony RX10 IV as a Travel photography camera
67
has touch to focus
good MP (16MP)
has built in flash
more heavy than others (396g)
does not offer selfie friendly display
56
weather proofing
connects via bluetooth
boasts focus by touch
MP count decent (20MP)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
long reach (600mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (1,095g)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10
Landscape photography with Sony RX10 IV
79
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
62
manual focus
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
exports RAW formats
weather proofing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10
Vlogging with Sony RX10 IV
33
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detection autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not offer selfie friendly display
doesn't have external microphone socket
more heavy than others (396g)
29
really wide (24mm)
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
includes microphone jack
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
more heavy than competition (1,095 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 and Sony RX10 IV
 Olympus OM-D E-M10Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Large Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2014-03-18 2017-09-12
Body design SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VII Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 25600 12800
Max boosted ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 200 125
RAW format
Lowest boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 81 315
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-600mm (25.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.4-4.0
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 2.7
Screen
Screen type Tilting Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 1,037k dot 1,440k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 1,440k dot 2,359k dot
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x 0.7x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Highest silent shutter speed - 1/32000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 8.0fps 24.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (ISO100) 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 secs 1/2000 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 396 grams (0.87 lb) 1095 grams (2.41 lb)
Physical dimensions 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 72 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 22.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 884 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 images 400 images
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-5 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $600 $1,698