Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-620 UZ
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Announced January 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Introduced January 2012
- Older Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M1X and Olympus SP-620 UZ, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and SP-620 UZ (16MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and SP-620 UZ (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M1X was announced 7 years later than the SP-620 UZ and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-620 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-M1X scores versus the SP-620 UZ for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1X & Olympus SP-620 UZ. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1X Gallery & Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
E-M1X | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2019 | January 2012 | Fresher by 86 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Olympus E-M1X
SP-620 UZ | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Olympus SP-620 UZ
E-M1X | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1X provides outer dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) while the Olympus SP-620 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1X and Olympus SP-620 UZ in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M1X vs the SP-620 UZ.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1X and SP-620 UZ is 54 and 78 respectively.
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing simply by checking a spec sheet. The visual here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1X and SP-620 UZ.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1X using its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1X will give more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics more aggressively. The more recent E-M1X will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Olympus SP-620 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Olympus SP-620 UZ |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2019-01-24 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Dual TruePic VIII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-525mm (21.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.1-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 997g (2.20 pounds) | 435g (0.96 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Built-in | - |
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Launch pricing | $2,999 | $199 |