Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SH-2
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Released January 2019
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed March 2015
- Older Model is Olympus SH-1
- Successor is Olympus SH-3
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M1X and Olympus SH-2, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are built by Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and SH-2 (16MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and SH-2 (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M1X was brought out 3 years later than the SH-2 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-M1X grades versus the SH-2 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1X and Olympus Stylus SH-2. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1X Gallery and Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Olympus SH-2
E-M1X | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2019 | March 2015 | Fresher by 48 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Clearer screen (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus E-M1X
SH-2 | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Olympus SH-2
E-M1X | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1X enjoys exterior dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) while the Olympus SH-2 has proportions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1X and Olympus SH-2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1X versus the SH-2.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1X and SH-2 is 54 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1X and SH-2.
As you can see, both of those cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1X featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1X will deliver more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher E-M1X provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2019-01-24 | 2015-03-11 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Dual TruePic VIII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 11.5 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 997 gr (2.20 pounds) | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) |
Dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 shots | 380 shots |
Battery form | Built-in | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | - | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Retail price | $2,999 | $399 |