Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-870
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c5b1/2c5b1898c62d7f187c0d40fb1eefb6649a2b2e72" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1X front Olympus OM-D E-M1X front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Released January 2019
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-860
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Olympus E-M1X and Olympus TG-870, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and TG-870 (16MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M1X was revealed 3 years after the TG-870 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-M1X grades versus the TG-870 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1X & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1X Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Olympus TG-870
E-M1X | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2019 | ![]() | January 2016 | More modern by 38 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 921k | Sharper display (+116k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-M1X
TG-870 | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Olympus TG-870
E-M1X | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1X offers exterior measurements of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) and the Olympus TG-870 has sizing of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1X and Olympus TG-870 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M1X against the TG-870.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93f28/93f28cf6beff7cb06b9a56d277d16bfe1dc5ef6c" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1X and TG-870 is 54 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fe95/4fe95c18c7641a51f444b9e92ab1c44ee78e27f3" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes purely by viewing specifications. The picture below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1X and TG-870.
To sum up, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1X with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1X will render extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent E-M1X should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf1cb/bf1cbe008cf6d1c9a75c54152154260e88d3ed2a" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e7fb/1e7fbf5d0e65888c1f5d5a7b875fbcbcc1a57855" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2019-01-24 | 2016-01-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Dual TruePic VIII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 997g (2.20 pounds) | 221g (0.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 photographs | 300 photographs |
Form of battery | Built-in | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Retail pricing | $2,999 | $280 |