Clicky

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX75

Portability
54
Imaging
61
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1X front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
32
Overall
35

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1X
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
  • Released January 2019
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
Panasonic FX75
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
  • 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
  • Released June 2010
  • Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FX70
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX75 Overview

The following is a in depth review of the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic FX75, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and FX75 (14MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-M1X was manufactured 8 years after the FX75 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-M1X grades vs the FX75 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Panasonic FX75

 E-M1X FX75 
ReleasedJanuary 2019June 2010Newer by 106 months
Manual focus More exact focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1037k230kSharper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-M1X

 FX75 E-M1X 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic FX75

 E-M1X FX75 
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1X features physical measurements of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) and the Panasonic FX75 has specifications of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic FX75 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M1X compared to the FX75.

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1X and FX75 is 54 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be hard to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions only by researching specs. The image underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1X and FX75.

All in all, the two cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1X featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1X will provide you with extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images way more aggressively. The more recent E-M1X will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1X
Portrait photography with Panasonic FX75
76
manual focus
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focus
saves RAW files
28
megapixel count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1X Street photography factors
Panasonic FX75 Street photography factors
67
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
comes with focus via touch
environment proof
very good high ISO (25,600)
more heavy than competition (997 grams)
62
image stabilization (Optical)
boasts focus by touch
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1X Sports photography information
Panasonic FX75 Sports photography information
80
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/32,000s)
high max fps (60.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
environment proof
better than average battery (870 shots)
comes with phase detect auto focus
39
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
provides tracking focus
max frames per second low (2.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1X
Travel photography with Panasonic FX75
68
better than average battery (870 shots)
environment proof
connects via bluetooth
comes with focus via touch
megapixel count decent (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
more heavy than competition (997 grams)
67
boasts focus by touch
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.2)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1X
Landscape photography with Panasonic FX75
79
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
environment proof
better than average battery (870 CIPA)
has double storage slots
37
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1X Vlogging features
Panasonic FX75 Vlogging features
68
display is selfie friendly
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection focus
high video quality (4096 x 2160 pxls)
does have external microphone port
more heavy than competition (997 grams)
31
reasonably wide (24mm)
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic FX75
 Olympus OM-D E-M1XPanasonic Lumix DMC-FX75
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1X Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75
Alternate name - Lumix DMC-FX70
Class Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2019-01-24 2010-06-01
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Dual TruePic VIII Venus Engine HD II
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 5184 x 3888 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW files
Min enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-120mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.2-5.9
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Max silent shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shutter rate 60.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 7.40 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Built-in None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 997 grams (2.20 pounds) 165 grams (0.36 pounds)
Physical dimensions 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 870 images -
Type of battery Built-in -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage - SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Dual Single
Launch pricing $2,999 $139