Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ200
54 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
65 Imaging
35 Features
64 Overall
46
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Released January 2019
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Announced July 2012
- Previous Model is Panasonic FZ100
- Renewed by Panasonic FZ300
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ200, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and FZ200 (12MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M1X was introduced 6 years after the FZ200 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-M1X scores vs the FZ200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1X & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1X Gallery & Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Panasonic FZ200
| E-M1X | FZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2019 | July 2012 | Newer by 80 months | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Crisper display (+577k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-M1X
| FZ200 | E-M1X |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic FZ200
| E-M1X | FZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Both good for selfies |
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1X offers exterior measurements of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ200 has proportions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1X against the FZ200.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1X and FZ200 is 54 and 65 respectively.
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over a spec sheet. The pic here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1X and FZ200.
As you can see, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1X having a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1X will deliver greater detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The more recent E-M1X is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2019-01-24 | 2012-07-18 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Dual TruePic VIII | Venus Engine VII FHD |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 1,312 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 13.50 m |
| Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 997 grams (2.20 pounds) | 588 grams (1.30 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 37 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 114 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 870 pictures | 540 pictures |
| Style of battery | Built-in | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Dual | Single |
| Cost at launch | $2,999 | $499 |