Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ200
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Released January 2019
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Announced July 2012
- Previous Model is Panasonic FZ100
- Renewed by Panasonic FZ300
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ200, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and FZ200 (12MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe E-M1X was introduced 6 years after the FZ200 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-M1X scores vs the FZ200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1X & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1X Gallery & Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Panasonic FZ200
E-M1X | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2019 | July 2012 | Newer by 80 months | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Crisper display (+577k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-M1X
FZ200 | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic FZ200
E-M1X | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies |
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1X offers exterior measurements of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ200 has proportions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1X against the FZ200.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1X and FZ200 is 54 and 65 respectively.
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over a spec sheet. The pic here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1X and FZ200.
As you can see, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1X having a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1X will deliver greater detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The more recent E-M1X is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2019-01-24 | 2012-07-18 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Dual TruePic VIII | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 1,312 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 13.50 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 997 grams (2.20 pounds) | 588 grams (1.30 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 37 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 pictures | 540 pictures |
Style of battery | Built-in | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Cost at launch | $2,999 | $499 |