Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ35
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Revealed January 2019
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Launched July 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FZ38
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus E-M1X versus Panasonic FZ35, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and FZ35 (12MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and FZ35 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M1X was brought out 8 years later than the FZ35 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-M1X matches up vs the FZ35 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1X and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1X Gallery and Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Panasonic FZ35
E-M1X | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2019 | July 2010 | More recent by 105 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus E-M1X
FZ35 | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic FZ35
E-M1X | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing |
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1X enjoys outside measurements of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ35 has proportions of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") with a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1X versus Panasonic FZ35 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the E-M1X versus the FZ35.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1X and FZ35 is 54 and 72 respectively.
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading through specifications. The graphic below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1X and FZ35.
Plainly, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1X featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1X will give you greater detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M1X will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2019-01-24 | 2010-07-06 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Dual TruePic VIII | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 8.50 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 997 gr (2.20 pounds) | 397 gr (0.88 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 images | - |
Battery format | Built-in | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Launch pricing | $2,999 | $999 |