Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic TS2
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c5b1/2c5b1898c62d7f187c0d40fb1eefb6649a2b2e72" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1X front Olympus OM-D E-M1X front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff78f/ff78f6be0ac1bb119e52dbaed8fc3dd165812a39" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2 front"
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic TS2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Revealed January 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 188g - 99 x 63 x 24mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FT2
- Succeeded the Panasonic TS1
- Refreshed by Panasonic TS3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic TS2 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic TS2, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and TS2 (14MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and TS2 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M1X was launched 9 years later than the TS2 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic TS2 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-M1X matches up vs the TS2 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic TS2 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1X and Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1X Gallery and Panasonic TS2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Panasonic TS2
E-M1X | TS2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2019 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 110 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS2 over the Olympus E-M1X
TS2 | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic TS2
E-M1X | TS2 |
---|
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic TS2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1X enjoys exterior measurements of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) whilst the Panasonic TS2 has measurements of 99mm x 63mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic TS2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1X vs the TS2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a99f/7a99f6c4d74b30ceb9a27b148004dc1eab77658f" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic TS2 size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic TS2 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1X and TS2 is 54 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d70a/4d70ab9f8ca96a2f9bfd414b87766ba9fe44aca3" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic TS2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic TS2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic TS2 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing purely by researching specs. The photograph below may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1X and TS2.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1X featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1X will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M1X will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb0bd/eb0bd3602c14262163f6033922b222b0cd5b7437" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic TS2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic TS2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic TS2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e64/86e64556c19486feb260ec5e833478a84956d140" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic TS2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic TS2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic TS2 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FT2 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2019-01-24 | 2010-01-26 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Dual TruePic VIII | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.10 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 997g (2.20 lbs) | 188g (0.41 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 99 x 63 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 images | - |
Style of battery | Built-in | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Launch cost | $2,999 | $350 |