Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax K200D
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c5b1/2c5b1898c62d7f187c0d40fb1eefb6649a2b2e72" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1X front Olympus OM-D E-M1X front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94ff5/94ff5a51162be558964f8f43fe832dff1cbdccd0" alt="Pentax K200D front Pentax K200D front"
61 Imaging
49 Features
41 Overall
45
Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Launched January 2019
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Released September 2008
- Previous Model is Pentax K100D S
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax K200D Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M1X and Pentax K200D, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and K200D (10MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and K200D (APS-C) offer different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-M1X was launched 10 years after the K200D which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a short view of how the E-M1X scores against the K200D in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax K200D Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1X and Pentax K200D. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1X Gallery and Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Pentax K200D
E-M1X | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2019 | ![]() | September 2008 | Newer by 127 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus E-M1X
K200D | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Pentax K200D
E-M1X | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1X offers external dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) while the Pentax K200D has proportions of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") along with a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1X and Pentax K200D in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1X versus the K200D.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72f46/72f46a564552b0849832ace04c6df117658582fb" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax K200D size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax K200D size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1X and K200D is 54 and 61 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4474f/4474f2fcde5ff11f9fbdd8398c27505650ccdb94" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax K200D top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax K200D top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions only by going over technical specs. The picture here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1X and K200D.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1X featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Olympus E-M1X will offer more detail utilizing its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The younger E-M1X should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b6a9/9b6a931fe44c49cd31c807111bc3033476deaa54" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax K200D sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax K200D sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1492f/1492f36aec37a0f25d9927763bcbd8c5021469fe" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax K200D Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax K200D Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax K200D Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Pentax K200D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Pentax K200D |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2019-01-24 | 2008-09-01 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Dual TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Total lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 997 gr (2.20 pounds) | 690 gr (1.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 561 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 shots | - |
Form of battery | Built-in | - |
Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | - | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | Dual | 1 |
Price at launch | $2,999 | $600 |