Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M5
- New Model is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M5 II was announced 20 months after the TG-2 iHS making them a generation away from each other. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-M5 II matches up vs the TG-2 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-M5 II | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2015 | June 2013 | More modern by 20 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 610k | Sharper display (+427k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M5 II
TG-2 iHS | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-M5 II | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 II enjoys physical measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") having a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Olympus TG-2 iHS has dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M5 II against the TG-2 iHS.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 II and TG-2 iHS is 80 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes simply by checking out specs. The pic underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 II and TG-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 II having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M5 II will produce extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics more aggressively. The more modern E-M5 II provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2015-02-06 | 2013-06-28 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 469 grams (1.03 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | 350 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $699 | $380 |