Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax WG-2
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c5b1/2c5b1898c62d7f187c0d40fb1eefb6649a2b2e72" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1X front Olympus OM-D E-M1X front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53f79/53f79318b036268028db17024c8c792be3aa6f4f" alt="Pentax Optio WG-2 front Pentax Optio WG-2 front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Launched January 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax WG-2 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M1X versus Pentax WG-2, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and WG-2 (16MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and WG-2 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M1X was revealed 7 years after the WG-2 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-2 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-M1X matches up versus the WG-2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax WG-2 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1X & Pentax Optio WG-2. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1X Gallery & Pentax WG-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Pentax WG-2
E-M1X | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2019 | ![]() | February 2012 | More modern by 85 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Olympus E-M1X
WG-2 | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Pentax WG-2
E-M1X | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1X comes with exterior dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) while the Pentax WG-2 has sizing of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1X versus Pentax WG-2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M1X vs the WG-2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07c9e/07c9e0f67691beceb090fd16f402d900c81682a3" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax WG-2 size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax WG-2 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1X and WG-2 is 54 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12107/1210786e7e2cc5d7fb447c97c731e9b99be604d2" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax WG-2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax WG-2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes purely by viewing specifications. The picture here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1X and WG-2.
Plainly, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1X having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1X will result in extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-M1X provides an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cca7/2cca78475459d8d39bbee69825a164acb52eeada" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax WG-2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax WG-2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60b0e/60b0ed52850aee855740ef5d7d9d855bfaef6c2e" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2019-01-24 | 2012-02-07 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Dual TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.40 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 997 grams (2.20 lbs) | 192 grams (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 photos | 260 photos |
Style of battery | Built-in | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Launch cost | $2,999 | $350 |