Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c5b1/2c5b1898c62d7f187c0d40fb1eefb6649a2b2e72" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1X front Olympus OM-D E-M1X front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0919f/0919f1115fdda8c239848792f287f46b2d1eed67" alt="Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front"
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Revealed January 2019
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Below is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-M1X and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-M1X was unveiled 9 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-M1X scores against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1X & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1X Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
E-M1X | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2019 | ![]() | November 2009 | More recent by 113 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+117k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus E-M1X
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
E-M1X | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1X comes with outside dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1X and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1X vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6614/a6614e3402bdbe44d779782078bf11a9a925e9c2" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1X and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 54 and 77 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af846/af846b4ff81a234aa00a9e4f07d4a0ca54085b26" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements only by reading through specifications. The visual below may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1X and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
To sum up, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1X with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh trickier and the Olympus E-M1X will give you extra detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-M1X provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfcb8/bfcb8dd7027ebe719d377570c807b04d3ddc97f0" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a766d/a766d41eeafdeee229a5842277a692147aea1034" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2019-01-24 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Dual TruePic VIII | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 50mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 180 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 997 gr (2.20 pounds) | 453 gr (1.00 pounds) |
Dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 shots | 320 shots |
Form of battery | Built-in | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | One |
Launch cost | $2,999 | $566 |