Clicky

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 6020

Portability
80
Imaging
53
Features
84
Overall
65
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
32
Overall
34

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
  • Released February 2015
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M5
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M5 III
Olympus 6020
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
  • Introduced February 2010
  • Alternative Name is mju Tough 6020
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 6020 Overview

Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus 6020, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and 6020 (13MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and 6020 (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-M5 II was launched 5 years after the 6020 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera.

Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-M5 II matches up against the 6020 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus 6020

 E-M5 II 6020 
IntroducedFebruary 2015February 2010More modern by 61 months
Manual focus More precise focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1037k230kCrisper screen (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus E-M5 II

 6020 E-M5 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus 6020

 E-M5 II 6020 

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 II has outside measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") with a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6020 has measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus 6020 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M5 II compared to the 6020.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 6020 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 II and 6020 is 80 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 6020 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes only by looking through technical specs. The image here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 II and 6020.

As you can tell, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 II featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M5 II will render greater detail utilizing its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 II should have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 6020 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 6020 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Portrait photography features
Olympus 6020 Portrait photography features
71
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
28
MP count decent (13MP)
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M5 II
Street photography with Olympus 6020
82
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
features focus via touch
weather proofing
great high ISO (25,600)
66
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
lighter than competitors (122 grams)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Sports photography highlights
Olympus 6020 Sports photography highlights
65
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
quiet shooting (1/16,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
weather proofing
bad battery pack (310 shots)
has no phase detect autofocus
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (13MP)
features tracking focus
environment proof
slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II as a Travel photography camera
Olympus 6020 as a Travel photography camera
74
weather proofing
features focus via touch
megapixel count good (16MP)
display is selfie friendly
bad battery pack (310 CIPA)
70
lighter than competitors (122g)
environment proof
MP count decent (13 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Landscape photography highlights
Olympus 6020 Landscape photography highlights
74
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
great high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
weather proofing
bad battery pack (310 shots)
40
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (13MP)
environment proof
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual control
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M5 II
Vlogging with Olympus 6020
82
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
comes with external mic support
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (122 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 6020 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus 6020
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IIOlympus Stylus Tough 6020
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Olympus Stylus Tough 6020
Alternate name - mju Tough 6020
Type Advanced Mirrorless Waterproof
Released 2015-02-06 2010-02-02
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VII TruePic III
Sensor type MOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 13 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 25600 1600
Minimum native ISO 200 64
RAW photos
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 1,037k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 1/4s
Max shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Max silent shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shutter speed 10.0 frames per second 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 4.00 m
Flash options Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 469g (1.03 lb) 122g (0.27 lb)
Physical dimensions 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 896 not tested
Other
Battery life 310 shots -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLN-1 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $699 $279