Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-860
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87f98/87f9860bdd2f90e1ac1160944f3da7fb05966ce6" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M5
- Later Model is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced February 2015
- Renewed by Olympus TG-870
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-860, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. The resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the TG-860 (16MP) is very comparable but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and TG-860 (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-M5 II was introduced at a similar time to the TG-860 so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-M5 II matches up vs the TG-860 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus TG-860
E-M5 II | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus E-M5 II
TG-860 | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus TG-860
E-M5 II | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | ![]() | February 2015 | Same age |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display size |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 II features exterior measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") along with a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) and the Olympus TG-860 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-860 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M5 II vs the TG-860.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b90a1/b90a15c4e313cbff7bbef3f65af8d79704677708" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 II and TG-860 is 80 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5a67/e5a67ca7fc49e64a1e6d185dd9989a05e7e8b8b5" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements simply by seeing specifications. The graphic underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 II and TG-860.
To sum up, both of those cameras feature the identical resolution but different sensor measurements. The E-M5 II uses the larger sensor which will make obtaining shallow depth of field easier.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab4d9/ab4d969d1ceb8f367b2e913e0ad2c8933a048118" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32a1e/32a1eb43fbb93ec3276f70237f97481b3c1cf6e2" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2015-02-06 | 2015-02-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 469 grams (1.03 lb) | 224 grams (0.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photographs | 300 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $699 | $279 |