Clicky

Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FP3

Portability
80
Imaging
53
Features
84
Overall
65
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
25
Overall
31

Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FP3 Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
  • Revealed February 2015
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M5
  • Updated by Olympus E-M5 III
Panasonic FP3
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
  • Released January 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FP3 Overview

Below is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FP3, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the FP3 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and FP3 (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M5 II was manufactured 5 years later than the FP3 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FP3 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-M5 II scores vs the FP3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Panasonic FP3

 E-M5 II FP3 
ReleasedFebruary 2015January 2010More recent by 62 months
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k230kClearer screen (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Panasonic FP3 over the Olympus E-M5 II

 FP3 E-M5 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Panasonic FP3

 E-M5 II FP3 
Screen size3"3"Same screen sizing
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FP3 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 II comes with exterior measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") having a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) and the Panasonic FP3 has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FP3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M5 II against the FP3.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FP3 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and FP3 is 80 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FP3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FP3 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements only by going through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 II and FP3.

Clearly, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 II featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 II will show extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 II provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FP3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FP3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FP3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic FP3 as a Portrait photography camera
71
has manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focus
supports RAW files
28
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Street photography factors
Panasonic FP3 Street photography factors
82
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
provides touch to focus
environment proof
above average ISO range (25,600)
60
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes touch to focus
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
heavier than average (155 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Sports photography factors
Panasonic FP3 Sports photography factors
65
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet mode (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
environment proof
bad battery pack (310 CIPA)
no phase detect auto focus
34
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (14MP)
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Travel photography information
Panasonic FP3 Travel photography information
74
environment proof
provides touch to focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
display is selfie friendly
bad battery pack (310 shots)
60
includes touch to focus
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than average (155 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M5 II
Landscape photography with Panasonic FP3
74
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
environment proof
bad battery pack (310 per charge)
37
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Vlogging factors
Panasonic FP3 Vlogging factors
82
display is selfie friendly
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have mic socket
27
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic support
heavier than average (155g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FP3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 II and Panasonic FP3
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IIPanasonic Lumix DMC-FP3
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3
Category Advanced Mirrorless Ultracompact
Revealed 2015-02-06 2010-01-06
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VII Venus Engine IV
Sensor type MOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW images
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 81 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 35-140mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-5.9
Macro focus range - 10cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/16000 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate 10.0 frames per second 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 4.90 m
Flash modes Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 469 gr (1.03 lbs) 155 gr (0.34 lbs)
Physical dimensions 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 896 not tested
Other
Battery life 310 pictures -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLN-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $699 $182