Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS25
Portability
80 Imaging
54 Features
84 Overall
66
80 Imaging
54 Features
84 Overall
66
Portability
93 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
93 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS25 Key Specs
Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Launched February 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M5
- Successor is Olympus E-M5 III
Panasonic ZS25
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Launched January 2013
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ35
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS20
- Refreshed by Panasonic ZS30
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS25 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-M5 II versus Panasonic ZS25, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the ZS25 (16MP) is pretty well matched but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and ZS25 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M5 II was introduced 2 years later than the ZS25 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS25 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-M5 II matches up against the ZS25 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS25 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Panasonic ZS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Panasonic ZS25
| E-M5 II | ZS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 26 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS25 over the Olympus E-M5 II
| ZS25 | E-M5 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Panasonic ZS25
| E-M5 II | ZS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS25 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 II features external dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") and a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS25 has specifications of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M5 II versus Panasonic ZS25 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M5 II and the ZS25.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 II and ZS25 is 80 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS25 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading through specs. The visual here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 II and ZS25.
All in all, each of these cameras offer the same exact resolution albeit not the same sensor measurements. The E-M5 II provides the bigger sensor which is going to make getting shallow DOF easier. The newer E-M5 II will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M5 II
Portrait photography with Panasonic ZS25
has manual focus
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
features face detection focus
exports RAW files
good MP (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Street photography with Olympus E-M5 II
Street photography with Panasonic ZS25
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
provides touch to focus
environment proof
very good ISO range (25,600)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
boasts focus via touch
lighter than others in class (193 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic ZS25 as a Sports photography camera
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
silent shutter (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
environment proof
low battery power (310 CIPA)
does not have phase detect auto focus
amazing zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
low max shutter speed (1/1,200 seconds)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (260 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II Travel photography info
Panasonic ZS25 Travel photography info
environment proof
provides touch to focus
decent MP (16MP)
selfie friendly screen
low battery power (310 per charge)
lighter than others in class (193g)
boasts focus via touch
good MP (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
great zoom (480mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
not so great battery power (260 per charge)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II Landscape photography information
Panasonic ZS25 Landscape photography information
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
environment proof
low battery power (310 shots)
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
not so great battery power (260 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II Vlogging advice
Panasonic ZS25 Vlogging advice
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have external microphone port
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others in class (193g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS25 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 |
| Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ35 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2015-02-06 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 81 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1200 seconds |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 469 grams (1.03 lbs) | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 896 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 photographs | 260 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $699 | $300 |
