Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax K110D
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87f98/87f9860bdd2f90e1ac1160944f3da7fb05966ce6" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b26ee/b26ee354c3adaf0307bfc7498c215c4050aaeba0" alt="Pentax K110D front Pentax K110D front"
67 Imaging
44 Features
30 Overall
38
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax K110D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Released February 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M5
- Replacement is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 585g - 129 x 93 x 70mm
- Introduced May 2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax K110D Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax K110D, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and K110D (6MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and K110D (APS-C) possess different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M5 II was unveiled 8 years later than the K110D and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K110D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-M5 II grades against the K110D for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax K110D Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II and Pentax K110D. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery and Pentax K110D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Pentax K110D
E-M5 II | K110D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2015 | ![]() | May 2006 | Fresher by 107 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 210k | Clearer display (+827k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K110D over the Olympus E-M5 II
K110D | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Pentax K110D
E-M5 II | K110D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax K110D Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 II has outside measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") and a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) and the Pentax K110D has specifications of 129mm x 93mm x 70mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax K110D in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M5 II and the K110D.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42abc/42abcb2584a356d6a484e7357f5a2fd32206c960" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax K110D size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax K110D size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 II and K110D is 80 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e6ff/8e6ffb6d02117ae99e3106733f3c4f4069b4b38d" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax K110D top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax K110D top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax K110D Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing simply by going through specs. The photograph below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 II and K110D.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 II using its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Olympus E-M5 II will produce extra detail having an extra 10MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The younger E-M5 II should have a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a81d1/a81d1a8b1f1a3264da8d6a7919898304c83d615e" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax K110D sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax K110D sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax K110D Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3aa5c/3aa5c40b3c6eb35c2b550165f711d69a61bf23cc" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax K110D Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax K110D Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax K110D Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Pentax K110D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Pentax K110D |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2015-02-06 | 2006-05-22 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 6MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3008 x 2008 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 210k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 469 gr (1.03 lbs) | 585 gr (1.29 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 129 x 93 x 70mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $699 | $1,000 |