Clicky

Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung CL80

Portability
80
Imaging
54
Features
84
Overall
66
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front
 
Samsung CL80 front
Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
30
Overall
34

Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
  • Introduced February 2015
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M5 III
Samsung CL80
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 4800 (Boost to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
  • Launched January 2010
  • Alternative Name is ST5500
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung CL80 Overview

Below is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus E-M5 II and Samsung CL80, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and CL80 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-M5 II was announced 5 years later than the CL80 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-M5 II matches up vs the CL80 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Samsung CL80

 E-M5 II CL80 
LaunchedFebruary 2015January 2010More recent by 62 months
Manual focus Very precise focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k230kClearer screen (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Olympus E-M5 II

 CL80 E-M5 II 
Screen dimension3.7"3"Bigger screen (+0.7")

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Samsung CL80

 E-M5 II CL80 
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 II provides physical dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") and a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) and the Samsung CL80 has proportions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M5 II and Samsung CL80 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M5 II vs the CL80.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung CL80 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 II and CL80 is 80 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung CL80 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by going through a spec sheet. The visual below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 II and CL80.

As you can see, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 II with its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M5 II will provide more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more modern E-M5 II is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung CL80 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung CL80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung CL80 as a Portrait photography camera
72
has manual focus
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
features face detection focus
exports RAW files
28
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II as a Street photography camera
Samsung CL80 as a Street photography camera
82
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
includes focus by touch
environment proof
very good high ISO (25,600)
60
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides focus via touch
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
heavier than average in class (160g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M5 II
Sports photography with Samsung CL80
65
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
quiet mode (1/16,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
environment proof
terrible battery power (310 per charge)
lack of phase detect auto focus
38
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Travel photography details
Samsung CL80 Travel photography details
74
environment proof
includes focus by touch
good MP (16MP)
selfie friendly display
terrible battery power (310 per charge)
60
provides focus via touch
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than average in class (160g)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung CL80 as a Landscape photography camera
74
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
environment proof
terrible battery power (310 per charge)
37
lovely big screen (3.7")
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
does not have Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M5 II
Vlogging with Samsung CL80
82
selfie friendly display
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
has external mic port
27
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic socket
heavier than average in class (160g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung CL80 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 II and Samsung CL80
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IISamsung CL80
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Samsung CL80
Otherwise known as - ST5500
Type Advanced Mirrorless Ultracompact
Introduced 2015-02-06 2010-01-06
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VII -
Sensor type MOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4334 x 3256
Max native ISO 25600 4800
Max boosted ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW support
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 31-217mm (7.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.3-5.5
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3.7"
Resolution of screen 1,037k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/1500 secs
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 10.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 469 grams (1.03 lb) 160 grams (0.35 lb)
Dimensions 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 896 not tested
Other
Battery life 310 pictures -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLN-1 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $699 $400