Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung EX2F
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M5
- Updated by Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Introduced December 2012
Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M5 II versus Samsung EX2F, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and EX2F (1/1.7") offer different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M5 II was revealed 2 years later than the EX2F and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung EX2F being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-M5 II grades against the EX2F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Samsung EX2F. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Samsung EX2F
E-M5 II | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2015 | December 2012 | More recent by 26 months | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 0k | Clearer screen (+1037k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Olympus E-M5 II
EX2F | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Samsung EX2F
E-M5 II | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 II enjoys physical dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Samsung EX2F has measurements of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M5 II versus Samsung EX2F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M5 II vs the EX2F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 II and EX2F is 80 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing specs. The visual below will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 II and EX2F.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 II with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 II will provide extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 II should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Samsung EX2F |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2015-02-06 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.4-2.7 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | - |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 469g (1.03 lb) | 294g (0.65 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | 48 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 896 | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $699 | $478 |