Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
80 Imaging
54 Features
84 Overall
66
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M5
- Renewed by Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Released February 2014
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
The following is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-M5 II versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sigma. The image resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is pretty comparable but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M5 II was launched 12 months after the DP2 Quattro which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M5 II matches up vs the DP2 Quattro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
E-M5 II | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | February 2014 | Newer by 12 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Sharper screen (+117k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus E-M5 II
DP2 Quattro | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Sigma DP2 Quattro
E-M5 II | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 II has got outside measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") with a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M5 II versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M5 II against the DP2 Quattro.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 II and DP2 Quattro is 80 and 70 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions just by going through technical specs. The pic below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 II and DP2 Quattro.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 II because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will provide greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The younger E-M5 II provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2015-02-06 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 45mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 469 gr (1.03 lb) | 395 gr (0.87 lb) |
Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $699 | $931 |