Clicky

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
80
Imaging
54
Features
84
Overall
66
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
  • Introduced February 2015
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M5
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M5 III
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Released February 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

The following is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-M5 II versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sigma. The image resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is pretty comparable but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The E-M5 II was launched 12 months after the DP2 Quattro which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M5 II matches up vs the DP2 Quattro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 E-M5 II DP2 Quattro 
ReleasedFebruary 2015February 2014Newer by 12 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k920kSharper screen (+117k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus E-M5 II

 DP2 Quattro E-M5 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 E-M5 II DP2 Quattro 
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen dimensions

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

When you are planning to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 II has got outside measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") with a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M5 II versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M5 II against the DP2 Quattro.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 II and DP2 Quattro is 80 and 70 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions just by going through technical specs. The pic below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 II and DP2 Quattro.

As you can tell, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 II because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will provide greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The younger E-M5 II provides an advantage in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Portrait photography camera
72
you can focus manually
MP count good (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detection focus
exports RAW files
77
manual focus
megapixel count good (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II as a Street photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Street photography camera
82
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
includes touch focus
weather sealing
very good ISO range (25,600)
61
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
fixed screen
no image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M5 II
Sports photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
65
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
quiet mode (1/16,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
weather sealing
not so great battery power (310 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
48
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
slow fps (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
lack of phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M5 II
Travel photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
74
weather sealing
includes touch focus
MP count good (16 megapixels)
screen is selfie friendly
not so great battery power (310 shots)
53
megapixel count good (20MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Landscape photography information
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography information
74
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
weather sealing
not so great battery power (310 shots)
59
manual focus
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
megapixel count good (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Vlogging information
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging information
82
screen is selfie friendly
touch screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
has external mic port
9
no video
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 II and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IISigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Make Olympus Sigma
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Sigma DP2 Quattro
Category Advanced Mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2015-02-06 2014-02-13
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VII TRUE III engine
Sensor type MOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW images
Lowest enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 81 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 45mm (1x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shutter speed 10.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual no built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 469 gr (1.03 lb) 395 gr (0.87 lb)
Dimensions 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 896 not tested
Other
Battery life 310 photographs -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLN-1 BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $699 $931