Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A900
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65


54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Released February 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M5
- Successor is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Launched October 2008
- Replacement is Sony A99

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A900 Overview
Here is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-M5 II and Sony A900, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and A900 (25MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and A900 (Full frame) posses totally different sensor sizes.

The E-M5 II was brought out 6 years later than the A900 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-M5 II scores versus the A900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A900 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Sony A900
E-M5 II | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | October 2008 | Fresher by 77 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 922k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Olympus E-M5 II
A900 | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Sony A900
E-M5 II | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 II enjoys exterior dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) and the Sony A900 has dimensions of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M5 II and Sony A900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M5 II against the A900.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 II and A900 is 80 and 54 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing simply by going over technical specs. The graphic here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 II and A900.
As you can tell, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 II because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony A900 will offer you greater detail having its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 II will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A900 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2015-02-06 | 2008-10-22 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 25MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6048 x 4032 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Total lenses | 107 | 143 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 469g (1.03 lbs) | 895g (1.97 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | 896 | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | 880 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Card slots | Single | 2 |
Price at launch | $699 | $2,736 |