Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony WX50
Portability
80 Imaging
54 Features
84 Overall
66
80 Imaging
54 Features
84 Overall
66
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony WX50 Key Specs
Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Announced February 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M5
- Renewed by Olympus E-M5 III
Sony WX50
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 117g - 92 x 52 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony WX50 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus E-M5 II and Sony WX50, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the WX50 (16MP) is fairly similar but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and WX50 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M5 II was released 3 years after the WX50 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony WX50 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-M5 II matches up versus the WX50 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony WX50 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Sony WX50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Sony WX50
| E-M5 II | WX50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2015 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 37 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1037k |  | 461k | Sharper display (+576k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX50 over the Olympus E-M5 II
| WX50 | E-M5 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Sony WX50
| E-M5 II | WX50 |
|---|
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony WX50 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 II features outside dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") and a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) whilst the Sony WX50 has specifications of 92mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M5 II and Sony WX50 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M5 II and the WX50.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and WX50 is 80 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony WX50 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading a spec sheet. The image below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 II and WX50.
As you can see, both the cameras have the same megapixels but not the same sensor sizes. The E-M5 II uses the larger sensor which should make getting shallower depth of field easier. The fresher E-M5 II will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony WX50 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II Portrait photography highlights
Sony WX50 Portrait photography highlights
has manual focus
MP count decent (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
features face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
good megapixels (16MP)
provides face detect focus
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II Street photography factors
Sony WX50 Street photography factors
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
comes with touch to focus
environment proofing
great ISO range (25,600)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (117 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II Sports photography information
Sony WX50 Sports photography information
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shooting (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
features tracking focus
environment proofing
not so great battery life (310 per charge)
lacks phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
provides tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II Travel photography factors
Sony WX50 Travel photography factors
environment proofing
comes with touch to focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
screen is selfie friendly
not so great battery life (310 CIPA)
lighter than competitors (117g)
good megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus E-M5 II
Landscape photography with Sony WX50
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
environment proofing
not so great battery life (310 shots)
fairly wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II Vlogging features
Sony WX50 Vlogging features
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does have mic support
fairly wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors (117g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
lack of mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony WX50 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2015-02-06 | 2012-01-30 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 81 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.6-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | Clearfoto TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 469 grams (1.03 lbs) | 117 grams (0.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 92 x 52 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 896 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 shots | 240 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLN-1 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $699 | $250 |
