Clicky

Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax RZ18

Portability
80
Imaging
62
Features
88
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front
 
Pentax Optio RZ18 front
Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
37
Overall
38

Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax RZ18 Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
  • Announced October 2019
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M5 II
  • Newer Model is OM System OM-5
Pentax RZ18
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
  • Revealed September 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax RZ18 Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M5 III versus Pentax RZ18, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and RZ18 (16MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and RZ18 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M5 III was revealed 8 years after the RZ18 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax RZ18 being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-M5 III matches up versus the RZ18 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Pentax RZ18

 E-M5 III RZ18 
RevealedOctober 2019September 2011Newer by 99 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1040k460kSharper display (+580k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Pentax RZ18 over the Olympus E-M5 III

 RZ18 E-M5 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Pentax RZ18

 E-M5 III RZ18 
Manually focus More accurate focus
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display size

Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax RZ18 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 III enjoys physical dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Pentax RZ18 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M5 III versus Pentax RZ18 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M5 III versus the RZ18.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax RZ18 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and RZ18 is 80 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax RZ18 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax RZ18 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions simply by checking specifications. The picture below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 III and RZ18.

To sum up, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 III with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M5 III will give you extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The younger E-M5 III should have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax RZ18 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax RZ18 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax RZ18 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M5 III
Portrait photography with Pentax RZ18
77
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
36
manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Street photography details
Pentax RZ18 Street photography details
83
screen can move to multiple angles
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
has focus via touch
weather proof
great high ISO (25,600)
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lighter than competition (178g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M5 III
Sports photography with Pentax RZ18
76
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
silent mode (1/32,000 seconds)
max fps high (30.0 frames/s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
weather proof
has phase detect autofocus
not so great battery pack (310 shots)
47
amazing zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment proofing
max fps very slow (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Travel photography features
Pentax RZ18 Travel photography features
77
weather proof
connects via bluetooth
has focus via touch
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
screen is selfie friendly
not so great battery pack (310 CIPA)
71
lighter than competition (178 grams)
environment proofing
MP count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
long reach (450mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Landscape photography information
Pentax RZ18 Landscape photography information
77
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
great high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
weather proof
not so great battery pack (310 per charge)
49
manual focus
rather wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
environment proofing
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Vlogging factors
Pentax RZ18 Vlogging factors
84
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect autofocus
high res video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
has mic support
30
rather wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (178g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax RZ18 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 III and Pentax RZ18
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IIIPentax Optio RZ18
General Information
Company Olympus Pentax
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M5 III Pentax Optio RZ18
Type Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2019-10-17 2011-09-12
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type MOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW format
Lowest enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-450mm (18.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-5.9
Macro focusing range - 4cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,040k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology - TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Max silent shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shutter speed 30.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 2.80 m
Flash options Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 414 gr (0.91 pounds) 178 gr (0.39 pounds)
Physical dimensions 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 310 shots -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLN-1 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $1,199 $210