Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung NX210
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c365/2c36512778594cdfbf2b2301f5cdebbcaebbc0db" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88a11/88a11bb02e0ad8b3bdbbf0916f24e031f73d8b87" alt="Samsung NX210 front Samsung NX210 front"
90 Imaging
62 Features
57 Overall
60
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung NX210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Revealed October 2019
- Replaced the Olympus E-M5 II
- Refreshed by OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 117 x 63 x 37mm
- Announced August 2012
- Succeeded the Samsung NX200
- Renewed by Samsung NX300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung NX210 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-M5 III versus Samsung NX210, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the E-M5 III (20MP) and the NX210 (20MP) is relatively similar but the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and NX210 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M5 III was announced 7 years after the NX210 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX210 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-M5 III grades versus the NX210 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung NX210 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III and Samsung NX210. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery and Samsung NX210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Samsung NX210
E-M5 III | NX210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2019 | ![]() | August 2012 | More modern by 88 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 614k | Clearer screen (+426k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX210 over the Olympus E-M5 III
NX210 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Samsung NX210
E-M5 III | NX210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung NX210 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 III offers physical dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Samsung NX210 has proportions of 117mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M5 III versus Samsung NX210 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M5 III vs the NX210.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03ab9/03ab95bd9936234c8f287781b9cace8d26ef1b63" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung NX210 size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung NX210 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and NX210 is 80 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/805b7/805b72785a6ad1260dde0d5520f02b26ca304a0b" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung NX210 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung NX210 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung NX210 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specifications. The pic underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 III and NX210.
To sum up, both of the cameras have got the exact same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizes. The E-M5 III uses the tinier sensor which will make obtaining shallower depth of field harder. The more modern E-M5 III is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/874ae/874aed15c976d5f8f6094f8b9e4a82c9a909ea72" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung NX210 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung NX210 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung NX210 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7bea/c7beac02d5d5f9867d40202eb8c3a12cd4150f8c" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung NX210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung NX210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung NX210 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Samsung NX210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Samsung NX210 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2019-10-17 | 2012-08-14 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Available lenses | 107 | 32 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414 grams (0.91 lb) | 222 grams (0.49 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 117 x 63 x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 71 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 719 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | 330 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $1,199 | $625 |