Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony HX200V
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c365/2c36512778594cdfbf2b2301f5cdebbcaebbc0db" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e76b5/e76b5f1031fe999502e3c5fe0f06c140249a3cfe" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front"
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Announced October 2019
- Replaced the Olympus E-M5 II
- Successor is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Launched May 2012
- Earlier Model is Sony HX100V
- Later Model is Sony HX300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony HX200V Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony HX200V, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M5 III (20MP) and the HX200V (18MP) is pretty comparable but the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and HX200V (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M5 III was announced 7 years later than the HX200V and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-M5 III grades against the HX200V when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony HX200V Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Sony HX200V
E-M5 III | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2019 | ![]() | May 2012 | More recent by 91 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 922k | Crisper screen (+118k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Olympus E-M5 III
HX200V | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Sony HX200V
E-M5 III | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 III comes with exterior measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Sony HX200V has proportions of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony HX200V in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M5 III versus the HX200V.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49d45/49d451f6181ca58ac9377c95262f6687d385d97a" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony HX200V size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony HX200V size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 III and HX200V is 80 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/079fb/079fb01b04ecf51629ecd828cdbc5dc148393d50" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor measurements merely by going through technical specs. The graphic here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 III and HX200V.
As you can tell, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 III using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 III will produce extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 III should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e1a5/1e1a594eb2dc8888fcde485f38a5bc00fb98120e" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b19e/7b19e65f4118aeb5ac2118c65865843e3a4e0bca" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony HX200V Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2019-10-17 | 2012-05-11 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | BIONZ |
Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 12.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414 grams (0.91 pounds) | 583 grams (1.29 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | 450 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $1,199 | $480 |