Clicky

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony TX200V

Portability
80
Imaging
61
Features
88
Overall
71
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V front
Portability
96
Imaging
41
Features
48
Overall
43

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony TX200V Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
  • Announced October 2019
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M5 II
  • Refreshed by OM System OM-5
Sony TX200V
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
  • Released January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony TX200V Overview

Following is a complete overview of the Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony TX200V, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M5 III (20MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and TX200V (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M5 III was brought out 7 years after the TX200V which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-M5 III scores against the TX200V for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Sony TX200V

 E-M5 III TX200V 
ReleasedOctober 2019January 2012More modern by 94 months
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus E-M5 III

 TX200V E-M5 III 
Screen size3.3"3"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1230k1040kClearer screen (+190k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Sony TX200V

 E-M5 III TX200V 
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison

If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 III has got physical measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has proportions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony TX200V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M5 III versus the TX200V.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony TX200V size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and TX200V is 80 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony TX200V top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes only by checking out specifications. The picture here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 III and TX200V.

To sum up, the 2 cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 III featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M5 III will show more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 III should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony TX200V sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony TX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M5 III
Portrait photography with Sony TX200V
76
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
36
resolution is good (18 megapixels)
features face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M5 III
Street photography with Sony TX200V
83
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
boasts touch to focus
weather sealing
great ISO range (25,600)
67
image stabilization (Optical)
offers touch to focus
environment proof
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Sports photography factors
Sony TX200V Sports photography factors
75
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
silent shutter (1/32,000s)
fast continuous shooting (30.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
weather sealing
sensor has phase detect autofocus
bad battery life (310 CIPA)
49
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (18 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
environment proof
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Travel photography details
Sony TX200V Travel photography details
77
weather sealing
connects via bluetooth
boasts touch to focus
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
display is selfie friendly
bad battery life (310 CIPA)
71
environment proof
offers touch to focus
resolution is good (18MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
no Timelapse mode
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Landscape photography features
Sony TX200V Landscape photography features
77
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
weather sealing
bad battery life (310 per charge)
46
relatively wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3.3")
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (18MP)
environment proof
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Vlogging details
Sony TX200V Vlogging details
84
display is selfie friendly
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection autofocus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
includes external microphone support
35
relatively wide (28mm)
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
no external microphone jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony TX200V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 III and Sony TX200V
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M5 III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
Category Advanced Mirrorless Ultracompact
Announced 2019-10-17 2012-01-30
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII BIONZ
Sensor type MOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 18 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 4896 x 3672
Maximum native ISO 25600 12800
Lowest native ISO 200 64
RAW files
Lowest boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.5-4.8
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3.3 inches
Resolution of display 1,040 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech - 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 2 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 30.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 3.10 m
Flash settings Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 414g (0.91 lbs) 129g (0.28 lbs)
Physical dimensions 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 310 images 220 images
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLN-1 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $1,199 $500