Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W370
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
 
               
              94 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Announced October 2019
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Successor is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 34-238mm (F3.6-5.6) lens
- 179g - 100 x 57 x 26mm
- Introduced January 2010
 Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video        Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W370 Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-M5 III versus Sony W370, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and W370 (14MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and W370 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.
 Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M5 III was introduced 9 years after the W370 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W370 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-M5 III scores against the W370 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
 Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes        Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W370 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Sony W370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Sony W370
| E-M5 III | W370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2019 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 119 months | 
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | 
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) | 
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate | 
Reasons to pick Sony W370 over the Olympus E-M5 III
| W370 | E-M5 III | 
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Sony W370
| E-M5 III | W370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions | 
Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W370 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 III provides exterior dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Sony W370 has sizing of 100mm x 57mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M5 III versus Sony W370 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M5 III against the W370.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and W370 is 80 and 94 respectively.
 
          Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W370 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by looking through technical specs. The image here should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 III and W370.
As you have seen, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 III with its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M5 III will provide you with more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more modern E-M5 III is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
 
          Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W370 Screen and ViewFinder
 
         Photography Glossary
Photography Glossary        Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
 Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
 Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
 President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
 Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
 Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
 Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
        
                
        Olympus E-M5 III vs Sony W370 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony | 
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 | 
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact | 
| Announced | 2019-10-17 | 2010-01-07 | 
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact | 
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - | 
| Sensor type | MOS | CCD | 
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" | 
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² | 
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel | 
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 | 
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 | 
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 | 
| Min native ISO | 200 | 80 | 
| RAW support | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 64 | - | 
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 9 | 
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens | 
| Lens focal range | - | 34-238mm (7.0x) | 
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.6-5.6 | 
| Total lenses | 107 | - | 
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 | 
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type | 
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" | 
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot | 
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None | 
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - | 
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - | 
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - | 
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 2 seconds | 
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds | 
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - | 
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s | 
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - | 
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.00 m | 
| Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro | 
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - | 
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 | 
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG | 
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None | 
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | 
| GPS | None | None | 
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 414 gr (0.91 lbs) | 179 gr (0.39 lbs) | 
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 100 x 57 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested | 
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 shots | - | 
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - | 
| Battery model | BLN-1 | NP-BN1 | 
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) | 
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/ Pro HG-Duo, Internal | 
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 | 
| Launch price | $1,199 | $230 | 



