Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic ZS3
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fe3d/7fe3d95a6f88c80bfaa18f73df4aba10c7f45067" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 front Olympus OM-D E-M5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91d60/91d606f8f15554d192c44ec0e68c877e6a1eff9a" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 front"
91 Imaging
33 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic ZS3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Introduced April 2012
- Later Model is Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Launched May 2009
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ7
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic ZS3 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic ZS3, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the E-M5 (16MP) and ZS3 (10MP) and the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and ZS3 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M5 was unveiled 3 years after the ZS3 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS3 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-M5 scores versus the ZS3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic ZS3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 Gallery & Panasonic ZS3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Panasonic ZS3
E-M5 | ZS3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2012 | ![]() | May 2009 | Newer by 37 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 610k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+150k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS3 over the Olympus E-M5
ZS3 | E-M5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Panasonic ZS3
E-M5 | ZS3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic ZS3 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 has got external dimensions of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS3 has measurements of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic ZS3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M5 compared to the ZS3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/007a9/007a9d6fd32a8ababf60b4e69355c23ea3013bb0" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic ZS3 size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic ZS3 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 and ZS3 is 81 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bf5a/3bf5a6e0a402d025ee53dd3aba96b041ecdde543" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic ZS3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic ZS3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic ZS3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions simply by going over specs. The picture here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 and ZS3.
All in all, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 will deliver extra detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The newer E-M5 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a0d2/5a0d257306ba77b543a2f63918aadf175b3e224d" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic ZS3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic ZS3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60f72/60f72779873aa4cca61ff29f649366ba4f249e7c" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic ZS3 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ7 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-04-30 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 610 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 425g (0.94 pounds) | 229g (0.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 71 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 826 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $799 | $200 |