Olympus E-M5 vs Sony H300
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
63 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony H300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Introduced April 2012
- Replacement is Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3-5.9) lens
- 590g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Introduced February 2014
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony H300 Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-M5 vs Sony H300, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M5 (16MP) and the H300 (20MP) is pretty comparable but the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and H300 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M5 was introduced 21 months earlier than the H300 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a short view of how the E-M5 matches up against the H300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony H300 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 Gallery & Sony H300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Sony H300
E-M5 | H300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 610k | 460k | Sharper screen (+150k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H300 over the Olympus E-M5
H300 | E-M5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | April 2012 | More modern by 21 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Sony H300
E-M5 | H300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony H300 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 has got outside dimensions of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Sony H300 has specifications of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") along with a weight of 590 grams (1.30 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M5 vs Sony H300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M5 against the H300.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 and H300 is 81 and 63 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony H300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizes only by seeing technical specs. The pic below might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 and H300.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Sony H300 will show greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged E-M5 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony H300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony H300 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-04-30 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | Bionz(R) |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5152 x 3864 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3-5.9 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 610 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dot | 201 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 8.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 425 grams (0.94 lb) | 590 grams (1.30 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 71 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 826 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | 350 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $799 | $249 |