Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S930
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62a6a/62a6a983a6af3568f6b39137b109a895b4f78a46" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 front Ricoh WG-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/381f2/381f21a2fdd26515ef89bb0353853c9563e3aa87" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S930 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 320 x 240 video
- 38-108mm (F2.9-5.4) lens
- 167g - 90 x 61 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S930 Overview
Below is a thorough comparison of the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony S930, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and S930 (10MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The WG-M1 was brought out 5 years later than the S930 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the WG-M1 grades vs the S930 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S930 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sony S930 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony S930
WG-M1 | S930 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2014 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 70 months |
Screen resolution | 115k | ![]() | 112k | Crisper screen (+3k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S930 over the Ricoh WG-M1
S930 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 2.4" | ![]() | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+0.9") |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony S930
WG-M1 | S930 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S930 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-M1 comes with exterior measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sony S930 has measurements of 90mm x 61mm x 26mm (3.5" x 2.4" x 1.0") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony S930 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the WG-M1 compared to the S930.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04ce8/04ce8890ff80777b591613b7b973a7210d5d361d" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S930 size comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S930 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and S930 is 91 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9afba/9afbad91a86116f3b111721c071a4a6bd275f109" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S930 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S930 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S930 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading technical specs. The visual here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and S930.
As you have seen, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to deliver greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern WG-M1 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/caefe/caefeb575f3a1ecb9a1089d5e240cd767c2240eb" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S930 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S930 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S930 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd46b/cd46b9d819a923a2148a91682eb004bc44f9e0ce" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S930 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S930 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S930 Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2014-09-12 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | (1×) | 38-108mm (2.8x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.9-5.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.5" | 2.4" |
Resolution of display | 115k dots | 112k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | - | 1/8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, Forced Flash, Slow Syncro, No Flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lb) | 167 grams (0.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 90 x 61 x 26mm (3.5" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-65 | 2 x AA |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / PRo-HG Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $2,000 | $219 |